Research and manufacture of portable device to detect pipeline defects using the magnetic leakage flux method

  • Pham Hong Quang Petrovietnam University (PVU)
  • Vu Minh Hung Petrovietnam University (PVU)
  • Phan Minh Quoc Binh Petrovietnam University (PVU)
Keywords: Magnetic imaging device, pipeline defect inspection, MFL method, non-destructive magnetic testing, magnetic flux leakage method

Abstract

To meet the needs of periodic health inspections of interconnected pipeline systems in factories such as refineries and ammonia plants, the research team developed a portable defect inspection device using the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) method. This device not only enables rapid inspection, but also features color imaging capability through a two-dimensional sensor array, 2D scanning mechanism, colorization technology and integrated mapping - features not previously available worldwide. The device is equipped with 64 flat Hall sensors arranged on a 2D array mounted on a curved base that conforms to the pipe’s radius. The sensor array and curved base are installed on a wheeled frame integrated with the magnetization system. The magnetization system consists of 3 blocks connected by a sliding plate mechanism, allowing adjustment to tightly fit pipes of different diameters. During operation, the device is manually pushed along the pipeline.
To enhance image resolution, the entire sensor is shifted by 1 mm along both the longitudinal and circumferential directions of the pipe after each measurement (image capture). The captured images are then integrated to produce a final image with 1 mm resolution.

References

D.C. Jiles, “Review of magnetic methods for nondestructive evaluation (Part 2)”, NDT International, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp. 83 - 92, 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0308- 9126(90)91892-W.

D.L. Atherton, “Magnetic inspection is key to ensuring save pipelines”, Oil and Gas Journal, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp. 52 - 61, 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0963- 8695(93)90206-a.

Yong Zhang, Zhongfu Ye, and Chong Wang, “A fast method for rectangular crack sizes reconstruction in magnetic flux leakage testing”, NDT & E International, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp. 369 - 375, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j. ndteint.2009.01.006.

H.A.Vanaei, A. Eslami, and A. Egbewande, “A review on pipeline corrosion, in-line inspection (ILI), and corrosion growth rate models”, International Journal of Pressue Vessels Piping, Volume 149, pp. 43 - 54, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.11.007.

Qingshan Feng, Rui Li, Baohua Nie, Shucong Liu, Lianyu Zhao, and Hong Zhang, “Literature review: Theory and application of in-line inspection technologies for oil and gas pipeline girth weld defection”, Sensors, Volume 17, Issue 1, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/s17010050.

Eddyfi Technologies, “Pipescan HD”. [Online]. Available: https://www.eddyfi.com/en/product/pipescan-hd.

Silverwing, “Pipescan - Adjustable magnetic flux leakage pipe scanner”. [Online]. Available: https://www.ndt-instruments.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/pipescan-mfl-pipe-inspection.pdf.

Slideshare, “Ansoft maxwell 3D field simulator v11 user’s guide”. [Online]. Available: https://www.slideshare.net/EraBrown/ansoft-maxwell-3d-v11-user-guide.

Huang Zuoying, Que Peiwen, and Chen Liang, “3D FEM analysis in magnetic flux leakage method”, NDT & E International, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp. 61 - 66, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.06.006.

Published
2025-11-13
How to Cite
Pham, H. Q., Vu, M. H., & Phan, M. Q. B. (2025). Research and manufacture of portable device to detect pipeline defects using the magnetic leakage flux method. Petrovietnam Journal, 3, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.47800/PVSI.2025.03-07