Influence of metal content in crude oil on the properties and performances of fcc catalyst and measures to maintain the fcc unit’s stability

  • Le Phuc Nguyen
  • Nguyen Hoai Thu
  • Tran Van Tri
  • Ngo Thuy Phuong
  • Nguyen Huu Luong
Keywords: Fe, metal contamination, feed oil, FCC, cyclic metal deposition (CMD)

Abstract

The influence of metals (Fe, Ca, Na, Ni and V) in crude oil on FCC catalyst performances was investigated. The fresh catalysts were deactivated by cyclic metal deposition method (CMD) with different concentrations of metals in the feed. Samples were characterized by N2 adsorption, XRD, SEM, and TPD-NH3, and were evaluated by a short contact time micro activity test unit (SCT-MAT). The study of catalysts contaminated with different iron and calcium sources (iron chloride versus iron naphthenate and calcium nitrate versus calcium naphthenate) shows that the nature of iron and calcium precursor has no significant influence on the catalyst performance. Fe leads to a higher yield in dry gas and lower cracking performance whereas the influence of Ca on the catalyst properties and performance is not considerable. However, the interaction of Fe - Ca could destroy the zeolite structure more severely than Fe or Ca alone and led to the important loss of MAT performance. The presence of Na would strongly destroy the zeolite structure and dramatically decrease the catalyst performance. The obtained results also illustrated that Fe and Ca accumulated on the outer surface of catalyst. This results in a more realistic simulation of equilibrium catalyst accessibility responses to iron and calcium contamination. Finally, some recommendations for the refinery in order to maintain the stability of the FCC Unit have also been proposed by the authors.

References

1. Nick A.Owen, Oliver R.Inderwildi, David A.King. The status of conventional world oil reserves - Hype or cause for concern?. Energy Policy. 2010; 38: p. 4743 - 4749.
2. V.Cadet, F.Raatz, J.Lynch, C.Marcilly. Nickel contamination of fluidised cracking catalysts: A model study. Applied Catalysis.
1991; 68 (1): p. 263 - 275.
3. Arthur.W.Chester. Studies on the metal poisoning and metal resistance of zeolitic cracking catalysts. Industrial & Engineering
Chemistry Research. 1987; 26 (5): p. 863 - 869.
4. Robert Pompe, Sven Järóasb, Nils-Gösta Vannerbergb. On the interaction of vanadium and nickel compounds with cracking catalyst. Applied Catalysis. 1984; 13 (1): p. 171 - 179.
5. E.Tangstad, T.Myrstad, A.I.Spjelkavik, M.Stöcker. Vanadium species and their effect on the catalytic behavior of an FCC catalyst. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2006; 299: p. 243 - 249.
6. E.Tangstad, A.Andersen, E.M.Myhrvold, T.Myrstad. Catalytic behaviour of nickel and iron metal contaminants of an FCC catalyst after oxidative and reductive thermal treatments. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2008; 346 (1 - 2): p. 194 - 199.
7. Lori T.Boock, Thomas F.Petti, John A.Rudesill. Contaminant-metal deactivation and metaldehydrogenation effects during cyclic propylene steaming of fluid catalytic cracking catalysts. Deactivation and testing of hydrocarbon-processing catalysts. American Chemical Society. 1996; 12: p. 171 - 183.
8. G.Yaluris, W.C.Cheng, M.Peters, L.T.McDowell, L.Hunt. Mechanism of fluid cracking catalysts deactivation by Fe. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Elsevier. 2004; p. 139 - 163.
9. E.Rautiainen, Foskett. Control iron contamination in resid FCC: With new techniques, refiners can detect and recover from this poisoning. Hydrocarbon Processing. 2001.
10. Pat Salemo, Doc Kirchgessner, John Aikman. Combating the negative effects of iron in the FCCU at Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining and Marketing, LLC. AFPM Annual Meeting. 13 - 15 March, 2016.
11. T.T.Nhu. FCC residue processing. Bayernoil Refinery Germany. 2013.
12. E.Rautiainen, Foskett. Control iron contamination in resid FCC. Hydrocarbon Processing. 2001.
13. Seiji Arakawa, Katsuhide Teshima, Mitsunori Watabe. Effect of iron compound accumulation on apparent bulk density and catalyst activity of FCC catalyst. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute. 2011; 54 (4): p. 258 - 265.
14. Trần Văn Trí, Nguyễn Hoài Thu, Nguyễn Hữu Lương, Lê Phúc Nguyên. Nghiên cứu phát triển phương pháp giảm hoạt tính xúc tác theo quy trình cấy kim loại tuần hoàn nhằm giả lập xúc tác cracking cân bằng của Nhà máy Lọc dầu Dung Quất. Tạp chí Dầu khí. 2015; 11: trang 35 - 42. 15. D.Wallenstein, D.Farmer, J.Knoell, C.M.Fougret, S.Brandt. Progress in the deactivation of metals
contaminated FCC catalysts by a novel catalyst metallation method. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2013; 462 - 463: p. 91 - 99.
16. D.R.Rainer, E.Rautiainen, P.Imhof. Novel lab-scale deactivation method for FCC catalyst: inducing realistic accessibility responses to iron poisoning. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2003; 249: p. 69 - 80.
17. Yannick Mathieu, Avelino Corma, Michaël Echard, Marc Bories. Single and combined Fluidized Catalytic Cracking (FCC) catalyst deactivation by iron and calcium metal - organic contaminants. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2014; 469: p. 451 - 465.
18. ASTM D5154-10. Standard test method for determining activity and selectivity of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts by microactivity test. 2003.
19. Zhu Yuxia, Du Quansheng, Lin Wei, Tang Liwen, Long Jun. Studies of iron effects on FCC catalysts. Studies in surface science and catalysis. 2007; 166: p. 201 - 212.
Published
2018-02-28
How to Cite
Le Phuc Nguyen, Nguyen Hoai Thu, Tran Van Tri, Ngo Thuy Phuong, & Nguyen Huu Luong. (2018). Influence of metal content in crude oil on the properties and performances of fcc catalyst and measures to maintain the fcc unit’s stability. Petrovietnam Journal, 2, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.25073/petrovietnam journal.v2i0.53
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>