Evaluation of CO2 capture technology application for exhaust gases from Petrovietnam’s coal-fired power plants

  • Nguyen Huu Luong
Keywords: CCUS, absorption, coal-fired power, CO2 recovery

Abstract

Vietnam has excellent CO2 storage potential, concentrated in the Song Hong, Cuu Long, and Nam Con Son basins, with their total potential storage capacity reaching ~41 - 110 billion tons of CO2, and has been oriented for its development in the National Energy Master Plan. Petrovietnam has an advantage in integrating CCUS into its current petroleum value chain. CO2 capture from power plant exhaust gases can be implemented through methods such as pre-combustion capture, post-combustion capture, or oxy-fuel combustion, with post-combustion capture being the most widely applied due to its ease of integration with existing power plants. Petrovietnam's coal-fired power plants can reduce emissions through post-combustion carbon capture, using amine solution absorption technology with a capture efficiency of 90%. The total investment for a CO2 recovery plant is approximately 1.8 billion USD/plant. Carbon capture results in a 62 - 94% increase in LCOE with a carbon capture cost (LCOC) of ~ 50 - 60 USD/ton CO2 (included power plant energy usage costs of ~ 30%). Increasing coal-fired power plant operating hours and CO2 capture unit depreciation time can help reduce CO2 capture costs by 15 - 20%. To deploy carbon capture solutions from coal-fired power plant exhaust, on one hand, legal, policy, and scientific-technological improvements are needed at the government level; on the other hand, coal-fired power plants and Petrovietnam in general need to develop a comprehensive roadmap for the full development of the CCUS value chain.

References

IEA, “Energy technology perspectives 2020”, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/energytechnology-perspectives-2020.

IRENA, “Global hydrogen trade to meet the 1.5oC climate goal, Part 1: Trade outlook for 2050 and way forward”, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/May/Global-hydrogen-trade-Cost.

Energy Transitions Commission, “Carbon capture, utilisation and storage in the energy transition: Vital but limited”, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy-transitions.org/publications/carbon-capture-usestorage-vital-but-limited/.

IEA, “The role of CCUS in low-carbon power systems”, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-ccus-in-low-carbon-power-systems.

Cục Biến đổi khí hậu, Bộ Tài nguyên và Môi trường, “Thông báo kết quả tính toán hệ số phát thải của lưới điện Việt Nam năm 2019”, 2021.

Xueyan Zhang, Xin Ma, and Huimin Song, "Quality degradation of alfalfa caused by CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage”, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Volume 246, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114147.

Global CCS Institute, “Global status of CCS 2020”, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/globalstatus-of-ccs-report-2020/.

VPI and JOGMEC, “Preliminary CCS potential study in Vietnam”, 2022.

VPI and PECC4, “Pre-feasibility study for hydrogen production in Vietnam”, 2022.

Tri Van Tran, Nguyen Le-Phuc, Thu Hoai Nguyen, Tung Thanh Dang, Phuong Thuy Ngo, and Duc Anh Nguyen, “Application of NaA membrane reactor for methanol synthesis in CO2 hydrogenation at low pressure”, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2017-0046.

VPI, “Carbon neutral LNG study in Vietnam”, 2024.

Shadia Moazzem, Mohammad Rasul, and M. Masud Kamal Khan, “A review on technologies for reducing CO2 emission from coal fired power plants”, Thermal Power Plants, 2012. DOI: 10.5772/31876.

Anders Thorbjörnsson, “Carbon capture and storage - energy penalties and their impact on global coal consumption”, Uppsala Universitet, 2014.

NETL, “Cost performance baseline for fossil energy plants Volume 1: Bituminous coal & natural gas to electricity”, 2022.

NETL, “Direct air capture case studies: Sorbent system”, 2022.

MTR, “Large pilot testing of the MTR membrane post-combustion CO2 capture process (DE-FE0031587: FOA 1788)”, 2018.

Christopher Hoeger, “Cryogenic carbon capture from cement production”, SES Innovation, 2023.

MTR, “Scale-up testing of advanced polaris membrane CO2 capture technology (DE-FE0031591)”, 2023.

Jian Liu, Praveen K. Thallapally, B. Peter McGrail, Daryl R. Brown, and Jun Liu, “Progress in adsorption-based CO2 capture by metal-organic frameworks”, Chemical Society Reviews, 2012.

Salma Ehab Mohamed Elhenawy, Majeda Khraisheh, Fares AlMomani, and Gavin Walker, “Metalorganic frameworks as a platform for CO2 capture and chemical processes: Adsorption, membrane separation, catalytic-conversion, and electrochemical reduction of CO2”, Catalysts, Volume 10, Issue 11, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/catal10111293.

Fanyi Kong, Wenqian Chen, “Carbon dioxide capture and conversion using metal-organic framework (MOF) materials: A comprehensive review”, Nanomaterials, Volume 14, Issue 16, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/nano14161340.

IEA, “Cost of CO2 capture from large-scale coalfired power plants”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/cost-of-co2-capturefrom-large-scale-coal-fired-power-plants.

BloombergNEF, “Energy transition factbook”, 2022.

World Bank, “State and trends of carbon pricing”, 2022.

IEA, “The role of China’s ETS in power sector decarbonisation”, 2021.

World Bank, “Why carbon prices should and will be different across countries”, 2018.

ERIA, “Economic impact of the early retirement of fossil power plants”, 2024.

Published
2024-10-31
How to Cite
Nguyen Huu Luong. (2024). Evaluation of CO2 capture technology application for exhaust gases from Petrovietnam’s coal-fired power plants. Petrovietnam Journal, 5, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.47800/PVSI.2024.05-04

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>